By Olivia and Cristiana
It’s kind of hard to believe that this is going to be the last blog post made on this site (we think)! Today, we came back to Tokyo on the shinkansen. Instead of rehashing the shinkansen experience, something that really struck us was the experience of returning to a place instead of going to a new one. When we took the train to Kyoto the first time, it felt very novel as we had never been on the bullet train before and because we were heading to a new area of Japan that was vastly different from Tokyo. Many of us had grown familiar with Tokyo, its sights, and how to navigate it, but Kyoto was much less urbanized (especially in the area we were staying) and the navigation system was much more confusing than the train system in Tokyo. Essentially, it was a little bit like relearning how to be a foreigner in Japan.
One of the major differences between Tokyo and Kyoto, as previously mentioned, are the transportation systems. Tokyo and Kyoto have both bus and train systems, but each rely on one more than the other– in the case of Tokyo it is the former and in the case of Kyoto, it is the latter. When we all returned to Tokyo and reached the train platform, the Yamanote Line jingle played and the faces of almost all of us lit up almost instantly. We had been talking throughout Kyoto about how we all had missed the voice of the announcements and the train jingles, but I don’t think that anyone realized how much peace the sound of something that had become so familiar would bring all of us. The inflections of her voice and the tiny sound from the speakers was almost like a homecoming.
Another major difference was the effect that cultural nuances (Shintoism, Buddhism, arts, etc) had on us while in Kyoto. The fact is that a majority of our stay in Kyoto was surrounded by these nuances. But while we were in Tokyo, there wasn’t much of it to see unless we made the effort to see it ourselves. To me, these small defining characteristics made such an impact on our experience in Kyoto. We’ve talked about the idea of “Japaneseness” and I believe Kyoto as a whole is a great example of “Japaneseness”. It is a city of preserved art forms and culture, not completely feeding into the changes with western tones. There is a strong sense of preservation for centuries old traditions and arts that Tokyo has seemed to let its modernizing overshadow. Kyoto is where we saw the tea ceremony, nishijin textiles, kimono/cloth weaving, textile dying- all of these that make up the term “Japaneseness” all have a foundation within Kyoto.
These differences across both cities represent why it’s so important not to generalize Japan into a monolith of a singular history, aesthetic, and culture. Kyoto and Tokyo were two very different areas, despite both being important to Japan’s history and both being major Japanese cities. Thanks to this trip, and hopefully thanks to this blog for some of you who have been following along consistently, we have been able to really begin to reify Japan into something complicated and nuanced that goes beyond a superficial understanding. In coming back to Tokyo after so much time in Kyoto, it demonstrated the range of experience possible in Japan and solidified the belief that Japan is more than what we generalize it to be.

































































































